Showing posts with label 3. Insurance News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3. Insurance News. Show all posts

Insurance costs to go through the roof


The car insurance industry is in far worse shape than I had feared. In 2010 it was warned that it was being closely scrutinised by the House of Commons Transport Select Committee, which took the unprecedented step of investigating the industry for a second time in 2011.
Last year the Office of Fair Trading added to the woes of insurers by embarking on a long-overdue investigation of its own. Now there’s talk of the Competition Commission and Financial Services Authority wading in, too. But even with these respected and powerful political and consumer-protection organisations breathing down their necks, insurers, brokers, agents, comparison websites and others in and around the car insurance/banking business still hit motorists with inflation-busting price increases over the past 12 months.
The latest British Insurance Premium Index (BIPI), published on January 20, states that the “average premium” for comprehensive cover is now £1,458, with third party, fire and theft (TPFT) typically costing £1,572.
Drivers seeking comprehensive cover and willing to shop around pay a more reasonable £971 on average (up from £843 this time last year), according to the BIPI data. But at the same time, the TPFT customer who goes to the same trouble typically pays an unfathomable £1,496 for his certificate (£1,390 a year ago), BIPI admits. If these official figures are anything to go by, the TPFT customer pays more when he shops around.
Contrary to what you may have been led to believe, it’s not young drivers who are suffering the biggest percentage rises in insurance costs. Surprisingly, it’s men in their thirties and forties. The largest (percentage) annual rise over the past 12 months has been for males between 30 and 49 who, on average, suffered increases of more than 19 per cent – about four times the general inflation rate.

Insurance: Seek cover, not money


When asked about his investment, 41-year old Rajesh Tripathi is quick to refer to Life Insurance Corporation’s endowment and moneyback policies. Asked about insurance for his life, his response does not change. Prod further, he promptly says, “These plans (endowment/ moneyback) are better, they give some returns. Pure life insurance is just a waste of money.”
Tripathi is not alone. Many insure themselves only through investment-cum-insurance plans. However, there is another option that not many may be aware of - term plans with return of premium. This is a standalone traditional insurance policy.
The good part: A term plan with return of premium would return the money you pay through the policy term. “It is a non-participating term plan that promises to pay back the sum of all the premiums, or a certain percentage of the premiums, paid by the policyholder during the policy term, at maturity. However, in case of a loss of the life assured, only the sum assured is paid,” says Rituraj Bhattacharjee, head (market management), Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance.
For instance, if one buys a return of premium cover and opts for a sum assured of Rs 10 lakh for 20 years, the amount payable at the time of maturity would be calculated as 20 times the annual premium. However, in case of an untimely demise during the policy term, the nominee would get only the sum assured, Bhattacharjee said.
There are policies that pay just the sum total of premiums, even if one survives the policy term. Sunil Sharma, chairman (advisory group), the Institute of Actuaries, says, “And, this will be less than the sum assured.”
In comparison, a term plan is the simplest form of insurance and does not pay back if one survives the policy term. The premium you pay is considered the pure cost. Only if the policyholder passes away during the policy term does his/her family get the sum assured.
Importantly, if a policy returns your money on maturity, it will definitely charge you for it. Therefore, a return of premium plan is expensive, as opposed to a term plan. A pure life cover, because of its nature, is more economic than a return-of-premium plan for the same sum assured.
A term plan would charge premium of Rs 2,000-2,500 annually for a cover of Rs 15-lakh for 20 years for someone in the age bracket of 30-35 years. A similar cover for the same person through a term plan that returns premiums would charge around Rs 10,000-11,000 annually.
Sample this: You buy a term plan with return of premium charging Rs 10,000 a year for 20 years. If you survive the term, you would get back at least Rs 2 lakh. However, if you buy a pure term cover and invest the balance (the difference between premiums of the term plan and return of premium plan) in equity diversified mutual funds, you can earn much more. In this case, if Rs 8,000 is invested in mutual funds for 20 years, the maturity amount would be over Rs 5 lakh (assuming 10 per cent annual returns every year). Obviously, markets would not return 10 per cent year after year. But then too, the returns would be much more than the assured sum of Rs 2 lakh.
In the last year, equity diversified funds lost 11.50 per cent, owing to the poor market conditions. Historically, equity, as an asset class, returns between 10-12 per cent a year. At the same time, investing the difference in fixed deposits would also help one earn decent returns --- between nine and 9.50 per cent a year.
Sharma says, “But, there are some customers who look for tangible benefits, and a return of premium plan is for such individuals. At the same time, if one is only looking for life cover, a term plan is recommended and it is much cheaper.”
Like a term plan, return-of-premium plans offer benefits in form of riders or built-in features such as accidental death, critical illness, hospital cash, waiver of premium and accidental permanent total/partial disability.

Congress expected to battle over military pay limits, rising retiree insurance


WASHINGTON — The Pentagon’s plan to limit pay raises for troops and increase health insurance fees for military retirees is certain to ignite a political fight in Congress, which since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has consistently
raised military salaries beyond what the Pentagon has recommended.
But Pentagon officials have made clear that military personnel costs are on a disastrous course — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has called them “unsustainable” — and that it is imperative that they be brought under control.
Military salaries have risen steadily since the Sept. 11 attacks, often because Congress gave the troops raises beyond those requested by the Pentagon. Officers have in many cases fared better than enlisted personnel: A private first class with a family and three years’ experience deployed to a war zone took home $26,700 tax free in 2001, compared with $36,000 today — an 11 percent raise over inflation. A lieutenant colonel with a family and 20 years’ experience in the same war zone took home $84,000 tax free in 2001, compared with $120,000 today — a 16 percent increase.
Health care costs for the Pentagon, the nation’s single-largest employer, have exploded in the past 10 years. In an attempt to rein them in, Panetta is calling for increased annual fees for the Pentagon’s health insurance — right now a family pays only $520 a year, far below the cost of a private carrier — and a fee for retirees older than 65 who enroll in Tricare for Life, a supplement to Medicare.
Panetta did not say what the new Tricare for Life fee would be. Currently, a retiree pays nothing for a benefit that makes up for whatever Medicare does not cover, although similar private supplemental health insurance costs an average of about $2,000 a year. One idea from the White House would have retirees pay a $200 annual fee for Tricare for Life, which the Office of Management and Budget said would save the Pentagon $6.7 billion in 10 years.

Insurance companies push to delay labeling regs








See that label above? That’s what a health insurance policy looks like — or is supposed to look like. Under the health reform law, insurance companies are required to summarize each benefit plan in a four-page, easy-to-read document (you can see the full thing here). The Obama administration rolled out a draft format for the summaries this past summer, and they were supposed to roll out this coming March, on the health reform law’s two-year anniversary.
Except, they won’t: In the fall, the Department Labor announced that it would no longer adhere to that March 2012 deadline, and instead would give insurance plans “sufficient time to comply.” Insurance companies have pushed for the delayed implementation. As AHIP, which represents the insurance industry, wrote in its comments, “The proposed rule requires almost a complete redesign of how information is provided to consumers and it will be difficult and costly to implement on this timeline.”
AHIP proposes a regulation that kicks in 18 months after it’s finalized. If the final regulation were to come out tomorrow, that would mean an implementation date in the summer of 2013.
Consumer groups, meanwhile, are getting nervous about when this label will actually come online — and what the final product will look like. Four major health-care groups sent a letter to the White House this week, urging the administration to stick with the template created this summer — and to get it out the door soon.
Consumer advocates worry that the White House may ditch the part of the label shown above, which games how much a subscriber would pay for a particular suite of medical services, such as delivering a baby or seeking breast cancer treatment. “We are very concerned that compared to the proposed rule that was released in August, the final rule we are expecting shortly will be weakened,” the Consumer Union’s Lynn Quincy told the Associated Press recently. “That would be very bad for consumers.”
A lot of this won’t get resolved until we see a final regulation and, right now, there’s no firm release date for that. The Department of Labor has not sent the regulation up to the Office of Budget and Management — one of the last steps in regulatory review — which suggests that we’re still a decent way off from seeing the final document, and from getting a sense of where the administration will land.

Markel American Insurance Company Joins the Progressive International Motorcycle Show in Cleveland, Ohio January 27th - 29th


WAUKESHA, Wis., Jan. 27, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Motorcyclists and motorcycle enthusiasts won't want to miss the Progressive International Motorcycle Show in Cleveland, Ohio January 27th - 29th. This year's show features an extensive collection of the new 2012 models, the Smage Bros Motorcycle Stunt Show, the Ultimate Builder Custom Bike Competition, and will also give show attendees the opportunity to speak to product experts themselves. The show will be held at the International Exposition Center in Cleveland, Ohio on Friday, January 27th from 3pm - 9pm, Saturday, January 28th from 9am - 9pm, and Sunday, January 29th from 9am - 5pm.
"We are excited to exhibit at the Cleveland show this year and connect with the Cleveland riding community," said Ted Wentzel, Director of Marketing at Markel American Insurance Company, a powersports insurance company that has provided specialty insurance for both factory made and custom built motorcycles and trikes for over 35 years.
"The show is a great way for us to connect directly with motorcyclists and stay up-to-date on the new motorcycle trends for 2012," Wentzel continues. "As a specialty insurance company, it's important for us to understand our customers and their needs when it comes to protecting their motorcycle."About Markel American Insurance Company:Markel American Insurance Company (part of Markel Corporation) specializes in powersports insurance such as motorcycle insurance, boat insurance and ATV insurance. For more information, visit www.markelinsuresfun.com .
About Markel Corporation:Markel Corporation markets and underwrites specialty insurance products and programs to a variety of niche markets. In each of these markets, the Company seeks to provide quality products and excellent customer service so that it can be a market leader. The financial goals of the Company are to earn consistent underwriting profits and superior investment returns to build shareholder value.

College Tuition Refund Insurance: Is It Worth The Cost?

Sallie Mae, one of the largest private lenders in the country, just launched open online enrollment for a host of insurance plans for consumers. 
This isn't the lender's first foray into the insurance world. It launched a tuition refund insurance plan back in May for college students.
With the latest additions to its suite of insurance offerings, including plans for for auto, renter's, health and travelers insurance, Sallie's clearly looking to diversify its business outside the realm of college campuses. 
There's nothing all that special about the new policies, but the whole idea of tuition refund insurance gave us pause. 
Insurance policies for college tuition function as a way to protect students if they have to suddenly drop out due to underlying medical issues. For $249 per year, Sallie Mae's plan will cover 100 percent of lost tuition but only up to $5,000 per semester. 
"With the average private college tuition in excess of $38,000, that leaves a sizable shortfall," says Joseph Orsolini of College Aid Planners, Inc. "That being said, I once had a client whose student gotten bitten by a spider in her dorm room and when into a comma for three days. She had to dropout for obvious reasons. This type of plan would have come in handy." 

Life Insurance Premium Financing Specialists Announce the Availability of an Internet Website Resource


TROY, Mich., Jan. 27, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The owners of American Premium Finance today announced the availability of their online resource site dealing with life insurance premium financing. This site, put together by premium financing specialists, is designed to be a "one-stop shop" for those wondering if life insurance premium financing is right for them.
In essence, premium financing is a technique whereby high net-worth individuals can secure a high payout life insurance policy without having to tie up their personal assets in order to cover the policy premium. According to the site owner, Alex Miller, "Typically these premiums are designed for the special needs of high net-worth individuals, so we are talking about policies with a death benefit payout of one million USD or more. Instead of having to come up with the cash -- or surrender personal or business assets -- to cover the yearly premium, arrangements are made with a financial institution to have them pay the premium, the cost of which is covered by a short-term loan. The policy holder makes regular loan payments, but the insurance premium has been paid by the financial institution, thereby keeping the life insurance in force during that time."
According to Miller, more and more businesses are taking out life insurance policies on their key employees, business officers, CEOs, owners, and the like. "Whenever a business loses a key player in their corporate roster, this can precipitate a crisis. Where will the company come up with the funds to hire a new person? What if the death of that individual causes key customers to quit doing business with that firm? How will they make up for those lost sales? A life insurance premium can provide the funds necessary to get that firm through this difficult time."
"In addition to paying the required premium to maintain the policy, it can serve as an investment vehicle. Business owners could finance an income stream for the business, and they can also keep any extra funds within the business. In addition, the value of the policy can continue to grow, and it will do so on a tax-deferred basis. This makes these policies extremely attractive, especially in today's difficult economic environment."
The site -- AmericanPremiumFinance.com -- offers a tremendous depth of resource material. A site visitor will find articles there that explain the basics of life insurance premium financing. This premium finance material is geared towards the person just learning about premium financing. In addition, they also provide step-by-step guidance to help the site visitor understand the financing process from start to finish.
A unique and timesaving feature of this website is their interactive inquiry tool. Miller explained how it works: "Suppose, for example, that you are looking for Arizona premium financing specialists in your area. You will input some contact information. Also indicate the best time to contact you, as well as your state and also indicate the wealth transfer amount that you would like to make available. You click one button and you will be contacted, by telephone, by a licensed insurance broker, who is trained and experienced in setting up premium financing arrangements. They will do the legwork for you, and find you the best policy for you at the lowest possible cost. It really couldn't be any easier."
According to Miller, the ideal candidate will usually be earning a minimum of $100,000 per year, and they will have a net worth of at least 2 million dollars. "In most cases, these types of policies will allow the policy holder to pay off their premium loan after two years. Either they can pay off the loan in full in order to continue their insurance coverage, or they can terminate the policy. Policies like this are designed for those people who need long-term protection, but who don't have the time or know-how to secure a policy or financing for themselves. It is a solution that works well for busy people who have significant assets to protect. Our site is a tool and resource that everyone can benefit from."

Renter's Insurance


NEW YORKERS who have gone without renter’s insurance may want to reconsider that decision after a year of wild weather that brought down trees and damaged rooftops throughout the city.
The earthquake last August would not have been covered by most renter policies, but damage from routine weather events — wind, rain, heavy snow, lightning — typically is. So are losses related to fire, smoke, vandalism or theft.
Renter’s insurance also includes liability protection, so if someone was injured at your home and sued you, your legal expenses and any court award would be covered, generally up to a $100,000 limit. Coverage often provides living expenses should you have to move out of your apartment — say, because of a fire.
Renter’s insurance is less expensive than many people realize: a basic policy costs about $300 a year for around $50,000 worth of property protection. Many renters who go without are under the mistaken impression that their landlord’s policy covers their possessions.
“As a renter, if your personal property is damaged, you’d have to have a renter’s policy to get coverage,” said John Capuano, an associate insurance examiner with the New York State Department of Financial Services. “The landlord’s policy is not going to cover your damages.”
An exception to that, he added, can occur if the landlord was “aware of a prior hazardous condition, failed to correct it in a reasonable time frame and your property was damaged.”
Renter’s insurance does not cover losses caused by floods — at least, not flooding resulting from water rising up in the streets (as opposed to your neighbor’s bathtub overflowing through your ceiling).
For flood coverage, you need a separate policy issued by the National Flood Insurance Program. And some private insurance policies also exclude hurricanes, Mr. Capuano said. Luckily for many policy holders last year, Tropical Storm Irene was not a hurricane by the time it reached New York. In addition, renter’s policies often have a deductible — meaning, for example, that the tenant would pay the first $250 or so toward replacing a stolen television before insurance coverage kicked in.
Policies differ in whether they offer replacement coverage, which pays the full cost of replacing an item, or actual cash value.
“Say you purchased a sofa 10 years ago,” said Loretta Worters, a vice president of the Insurance Information Institute, a nonprofit sponsored by the insurance industry. “Today, to buy new, maybe that sofa would cost $3,000 or $4,000. With actual-cash-value coverage, if it’s a 10-year-old sofa, they’re taking the value to be maybe $500.”
To help renters calculate how much coverage they need, the institute offers a home inventory tool at www.knowyourstuff.org. A room-by-room inventory may determine that you need more than the $50,000 or so that the basic policy offers. And while you’re at it, take photos of expensive items; they may be useful if you ever have to file a claim.
The New York State Department of Financial Services has a consumer guide to shopping for homeowner’s and renter’s insurance. It includes price comparison tables for the largest insurance providers. And Allstate has developed a free “Digital Locker” mobile app that lets you create and store an inventory of your possessions.
But while you are comparison shopping, or if you have a policy you have never bothered to read, you should make sure you understand what is not covered by a particular plan.
With most policies, there are limits on how much coverage is offered for jewelry, watches, fine art, musical instruments, guns, cameras, silverware and computers. Jewelry is typically capped at $1,000, although you can purchase a rider or floater to get more coverage. A professional appraisal may be required.
Another area that can surprise people who work at home is the standard $2,500 limit for equipment used for a business. That may not be enough for a graphic designer with an expensive computer and scanner. And using a computer for both business and Facebook updates can complicate a claim..

Buyers Concerned About Insurance Pricing, Availability, Survey Finds


Risk managers and financial executives who are facing property renewals have significant concerns about the availability and pricing of coverage, according to a global survey.
The survey of member firms of The Independents, an international coalition of insurance brokers and risk management services firms, shows that risk managers and buyers also are concerned about managing risk with fewer resources and reduced budgets, particularly for firms with large natural-hazard and supply-chain exposures.
The survey, which includes responses from 25 member firms, finds that nearly all (96 percent) respondents believe that their insurance-buyer clients are most concerned about availability and cost of coverage. Nearly half (48 percent) also indicate their clients have significant concerns about managing risks with fewer resources, such as reduced budgets.
While price concerns are not new, John Eltham, head of North American business for Miller Insurance and founder of The Independents tells NU Online News Service, “When you get behind it, it’s actually value for money.”
He adds, “The buyers have been through a tough time since 2008. They have gotten much more in touch with their business. Opportunity and risk fit squarely side-by-side and the risk managers now want more tailored insurance programs that reflect their specific exposures, their specific risks.”
Regarding supply-chain risks, Eltham says catastrophes in Japan and Thailand have been a wakeup call to the buying community. “There’s a fragility of supply chains, particularly international ones,” he says.
As they renew their insurance programs, risk managers and other insurance buyers generally are finding a more challenging environment for transferring risks associated with facilities located in areas prone to natural catastrophes, such as earthquakes, windstorms, floods and tsunami, he says.
He adds that underwriters also have had a wakeup call, “because Thailand was considered a non-cat area and therefore the amount of modeling and monitoring of aggregation leaves a little to be desired.”
For some underwriters, he says, it’s been a surprise “just how much exposure they have. So [buyers and underwriters] are looking at the same situation—buyers saying they might want to buy more and underwriters saying they might want to cut back on this.”